References for: comment

Full identifier: http://purl.org/np/RAorOLuZlfyIYI0GypT2_X-Z7Ern_E-P5YieLFu-xSB1s#comment

Nanopublication Part Subject Predicate Object Published By Published On
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
4
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
The scientific claim does not seem to be atomic, as it mentions two genes, IRX3 and IRX5. I think it should be broken into two different claims, one for each of these genes.
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Cristina-Iulia Bucur
2021-10-06T19:51:12.581Z