https://w3id.org/np/RAnnTUV-FM... RAnnTUV-FM

links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance

http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo wasAttributedTo

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234 Tobias Kuhn

Tobias Kuhn

2024-09-09T07:57:46.900Z

https://w3id.org/np/RAnnTUV-FM... RAnnTUV-FM

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator creator

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234 Tobias Kuhn

Tobias Kuhn

2024-09-09T07:57:46.900Z

https://w3id.org/np/RAnnTUV-FM... RAnnTUV-FM

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://purl.org/spar/cito/reviews reviews

https://w3id.org/np/RAbBw6Wc4q... RAbBw6Wc4q

Tobias Kuhn

2024-09-09T07:57:46.900Z

https://w3id.org/np/RAnnTUV-FM... RAnnTUV-FM

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment comment

The taxon name should be refered to by its ZooBank URL (https://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/7ad8f87f-e7c1-4094-bd63-7662f167e9cb) as in the other nanopublication (this one: https://w3id.org/np/RANfU_7tS66XyfZS4RauqKLLnSEcfa1L06ueqKGLMU9TA), and not as a locally minted identifier. Otherwise, this nanopublications looks good on the formal side, and seems to match the content of the manuscript (under review) as much as I can tell as a non-expert of the field.

Tobias Kuhn

2024-09-09T07:57:46.900Z