https://w3id.org/kpxl/gen/terms/Event Event

This is one of the weekly office hours of the Knowledge Pixels incubators.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8492-0354 Ashley Caselli , https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234 Tobias Kuhn , https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0118-9195 Virginia Balseiro

I would like us to explore ways in which potential peer reviewers could express their preferences, availability etc. regarding peer review in a standardized and queriable fashion.

- scientific expertise (topic/ methodology etc.) - review preferences (e.g. only open-access resources) - temporal aspects (e.g. recent reviewer load, current availability) The third one is a bit privacy-sensitive, so we could perhaps start with the first two.

We have a first nanopub using the "I have reviewed X" template.

We now have a first draft for "I have reviewed X"

A simple starting point would be to adapt the "I have read X" nanopub template such that we get a new one that says "I have reviewed Y".

Cross-disciplinary way to describe research fields