assertion

Full identifier: https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWtxawZ8wGeMwa6WUQxAH5LGrJ2oVGVkOAuYAw#assertion

Minted in Nanopublication

 CoSMO Semantic Post SemanticPost comment approve/disapprove edit as derived nanopublication

This is the identifier for the assertion of this nanopublication. https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWt...#assertion this assertion http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment comment (this is a literal) " I just had the most marvelous chat with @CohereForAI-R, Claude and Latex (next tweet) I asked +R to explain a latex error, and it failed. NP, happens Claude gave a partial direction, sending me back to latex In latex I found the error, but was too lazy to solve so ... 1/2 https://twitter.com/LChoshen/status/1817455710365495492/photo/1 I gave Claude the additional feedback and it Solved it! Then came the surprising moment In parallel, I also told R about my discussions with Claude, and it recognized the feedback perfectly! If only I could improve models that way... (data is collected by https://sharelm.github.io/) https://twitter.com/LChoshen/status/1817455713054077372/photo/1 So maybe natural feedback extraction would be able to use it one day? https://x.com/LChoshen/status/1813662203532263467 P.S. Think if we didn't only save chats and feedback and extracted, but UIs would have asked: I noticed you had a problem, was it solved eventually? How? Like stack overflow for our own (open, mind you) specialized models. I'd be happy to teach them if it was used to help others " .
This is the identifier for the assertion of this nanopublication. https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWt...#assertion The assertion above http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasGeneratedBy wasGeneratedBy This is a local identifier minted within the nanopublication. https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWt...#activity activity .
This is the identifier for this whole nanopublication. https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWt... This nanopublication date and time when the nanopublication was created http://purl.org/dc/terms/created was created on (this is a literal) "2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z" .
This is a local identifier minted within the nanopublication. https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWt...#sig sig http://purl.org/nanopub/x/hasSignatureTarget has as target This is the identifier for this whole nanopublication. https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWt... this nanopublication .
This is a local identifier minted within the nanopublication. https://w3id.org/np/RA-C4K9zWt...#sig sig http://purl.org/nanopub/x/hasAlgorithm has the algorithm (this is a literal) "RSA" .

Sensenets, 12 Sep 2024, 18:44:44 UTC

References

Nanopublication Part Subject Predicate Object Published By Published On
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
assertion
I just had the most marvelous chat with @CohereForAI-R, Claude and Latex (next tweet) I asked +R to explain a latex error, and it failed. NP, happens Claude gave a partial direction, sending me back to latex In latex I found the error, but was too lazy to solve so ... 1/2 https://twitter.com/LChoshen/status/1817455710365495492/photo/1 I gave Claude the additional feedback and it Solved it! Then came the surprising moment In parallel, I also told R about my discussions with Claude, and it recognized the feedback perfectly! If only I could improve models that way... (data is collected by https://sharelm.github.io/) https://twitter.com/LChoshen/status/1817455713054077372/photo/1 So maybe natural feedback extraction would be able to use it one day? https://x.com/LChoshen/status/1813662203532263467 P.S. Think if we didn't only save chats and feedback and extracted, but UIs would have asked: I noticed you had a problem, was it solved eventually? How? Like stack overflow for our own (open, mind you) specialized models. I'd be happy to teach them if it was used to help others
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z
links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance
assertion
Sensenets
2024-09-12T18:44:44.315Z

Raw

TriG(txt), JSON-LD(txt), N-Quads(txt), XML(txt)